Home Opinion The courtesy that’s beyond please and thank you, by Ruth Oji

The courtesy that’s beyond please and thank you, by Ruth Oji

4
0

 

Were you taught in primary school to use the magic words? Most people think courtesy means saying “please” and “thank you”, holding doors for others, not interrupting when others speak, remembering the social graces your parents taught you, and the etiquette that makes interactions flow smoothly and signals you were raised right.

Advertisement
Vice-Chancellor


Vice-Chancellor


Kola Daisi University


Kola Daisi University

Well, that’s not wrong, to say the least. But it misses what courtesy actually does in professional communication. The courtesy that matters—the kind that changes outcomes, builds trust, and makes people want to work with you—has almost nothing to do with politeness. It has everything to do with how you treat another person’s understanding, their time, and their dignity when you communicate. I cannot emphasize this enough, as I’ve watched this play out across every professional context I’ve encountered. The courtesy that matters shows up in events most people don’t even recognize as courtesy at all.

To make the point, I share the following examples. A student sits in office hours, confused about feedback on her paper. She could nod and pretend she understands—that would be polite. Instead, she says, “I’m not clear on what you mean by ‘develop this further.’ Could you show me what that would look like in this specific paragraph?” The professor pauses. Most students don’t ask. They leave confused, then complain the feedback was vague. This student just did something that looks simple but isn’t: she listened to the feedback, identified exactly where her understanding broke down, and asked a question specific enough that the professor could actually answer it.

That’s courtesy. Not because it’s polite to ask questions, but because it respects both people’s time. The professor doesn’t have to guess what the student didn’t understand. The student doesn’t have to waste hours working on the wrong thing. The question itself shows she took the feedback seriously enough to think about it before asking for more.

The professor’s response changes. She opens the paper, points to a specific sentence, and shows exactly what she meant. The conversation becomes useful. The student leaves with something she can actually do. And the next time this student has a question, the professor will make time for it, because she knows the question will be worth answering.

Check how this would work in an office setting. In a corporate office, a manager gives feedback to someone on his team. The feedback is direct: the presentation didn’t land with the client, and here’s the reason. The team member could get defensive—that would be natural. Instead, she asks, “What specifically didn’t work? Was it the structure, or was I missing something about what they actually needed?” By asking those questions, she made it safe for her manager to tell her the truth. When most people receive critical feedback, they send signals that they don’t really want to hear it. They explain why things happened the way they did. They point to constraints. They subtly communicate, “stop talking, I’ve heard enough.” And that’s bad. They make people hesitant to give them helpful feedback.

This person did the opposite. She asked for more detail. She made it clear she could handle honesty. And because she did, her manager told her something useful: the client had been expecting data on implementation costs, and the presentation focused on features instead. That’s actionable. That’s something she can fix next time.

The courtesy here isn’t in accepting feedback gracefully—though that matters. It’s in how she asked the follow-up question. She didn’t ask the manager to make her feel better about the presentation. She asked him to help her understand what actually went wrong. That respect for clarity over comfort changed what her manager was willing to tell her. And it changed what she learned.

Next setting is the media. A journalist interviews a source for a story on housing policy. Halfway through, the source says something that seems to contradict what he said earlier. The journalist could pounce—that would make for a dramatic moment. Instead, she says, “Help me understand. Earlier you said X, and now you’re saying Y. Am I missing something, or did your thinking change?”

She just gave him room to clarify instead of assuming she caught him in an inconsistency. And it turns out she was missing something: he was talking about two different policy proposals that sounded similar but weren’t. Once he explained the distinction, the whole interview made more sense.

That question—”Am I missing something?”—is an act of courtesy that most people skip. We assume we understood. We assume if something seems contradictory, the other person messed up. But asking rather than assuming does something powerful: it invites the other person to think alongside you instead of defending themselves against you.

The source relaxed. He started explaining his reasoning more fully, because he could tell she actually wanted to understand it. The story she wrote was better because of that one question. And the source will talk to her again, because he knows she’ll represent his thinking fairly.

We move on to tech. In a tech company, an engineer needs to explain a complex infrastructure decision to the marketing team. She could use technical jargon—she knows it, they don’t, and that would establish her expertise. Instead, she says, “Think of it like this,” and uses an analogy about how they already organize their campaign workflows. Then she checks, “Do you get the point, or should I come at it differently?”

She just made it safe for them to say they don’t understand. Most technical experts make people feel stupid for not following along. This engineer made it clear that if they’re confused, it’s her job to explain better, not their job to pretend they get it. The marketing team asked questions. Real questions, not the vague “makes sense” that means they’re lost. And because they understood the infrastructure decision, they could actually plan their campaigns around it. The courtesy of clear explanation—and the invitation to ask for more clarity—changed whether the teams could actually work together.

Can you deduce what’s happening in all these moments? I’m sure you do. Courtesy creates the conditions for honest communication. When you listen before responding, when you seek to understand before assuming, when you make your point clearly without making someone else work for it—you’re not just being nice. You’re making it possible for the other person to engage fully.

People respond to courtesy by trusting you more. They tell you things they wouldn’t otherwise say. They ask questions instead of nodding along. They think alongside you instead of defending themselves against you. And that changes everything about what you can accomplish together.

The person who receives courtesy doesn’t just feel better—though they do. They actually contribute more, because you’ve made it safe to think out loud, to admit confusion, to ask for what they need. That’s not a soft skill. That’s the mechanism through which real work gets done.

Tomorrow, you’ll send emails. You’ll have conversations. You’ll be in meetings or on calls. Three things to notice:

First, listen before you respond. Not polite listening where you wait for your turn to talk. Actual listening where you’re trying to understand what the other person means before you decide what to say about it. You’ll be surprised how often you realize you were about to respond to something they didn’t actually say.

Second, ask rather than assume. When something seems unclear or contradictory, ask if you’re missing something instead of concluding the other person is wrong. Half the time, you are missing something. The other half, your question will help them clarify their own thinking. Either way, you both end up with better understanding.

Third, make your point clearly. Don’t make people work to figure out what you mean. Don’t hide behind jargon or vagueness. Respect their time by saying what you mean directly enough that they can actually engage with it. Otherwise, you’re not being courteous.

What I have shared aren’t etiquette. They’re not about being polite. They’re about treating other people’s understanding as something that matters—because it does, and because how you treat it determines whether they’ll actually work with you or just go through the motions.

That’s the courtesy no one talks about. And once you see it, you’ll notice it everywhere. Subscribe to my Substack – The Pragmatic Communicator – for in-depth essays in communication.

Advertisement
University of Medical Sciences Ondo


University of Medical Sciences Ondo


Ajayi Crowther University


Ajayi Crowther University


Bethel American International School


Bethel American International School


ICAN ATSWA LECTURES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here